arXiv News

First-hand information for everyone

Site

AboutPrivacy PolicyTerms of Use

© 2026 arXiv News

Fast, analytical model predicts the admittance of elliptical metasurfaces with high accuracy | arXiv News

arXiv News

EnglishJapanese

Switch language

EnglishJapanese
Loading account…

First-hand information for everyone

Back to front page
PhysicsEnglishPublished

Fast, analytical model predicts the admittance of elliptical metasurfaces with high accuracy

November 7, 2026arXiv: 2611.08166v1

Scientists have produced the first analytical formula that calculates how arrays of elliptical metal patches respond to electromagnetic waves. The model uses a Galerkin technique that works directly on the shape of each patch, without needing a fine mesh, and an affine transformation that turns any rotated ellipse into a unit circle. This single mathematical recipe therefore covers every orientation and aspect ratio of the ellipse. The calculation is extremely fast – evaluating the full‑band spectrum takes only a few tens of milliseconds on a standard workstation, about 1,000 times faster than conventional full‑wave solvers. Its predictions agree with rigorous method‑of‑moments simulations up to the fundamental resonance and correctly capture substrate‑guided mode anomalies. For 200 eigenvalues spanning five aspect ratios, five gap values and four common substrate designs, the model matches the reference within 1 % for 92 % of the values and within 0.5 % for nearly 76 %. The few outliers – the small‑eigenvalue modes when the ellipse is very stretched and the gap is tiny – are mostly due to the benchmark solver’s own convergence limits. The formulation applies only to periodic arrays on grounded dielectric slabs and to elliptical patches; it cannot directly handle isolated or non‑elliptical shapes, or predict propagating surface waves beyond the first Brillouin zone.

Bar plot comparing error percentages of a Jacobi–Galerkin solver with MoM reference: 92 % of eigenvalues are within ±1 % and 75.5 % within ±0.5 %. Separate bars highlight the minority of minor eigenvalues that exceed the ±1 % threshold, specifically for the RO3010 substrate under high aspect ratio and small gap conditions.
Fig. 5. Figure 5 shows the comparison of 200 eigenvalues computed by the proposed analytic Jacobi–Galerkin solver with Richardson‑extrapolated MoM reference values across 100 benchmark configurations: top panel – percent of eigenvalues within ±1 % (92 %) and within ±0.5 % (75.5 %); bottom panel – minor eigenvalues C₀,₂ that lie outside the ±1 % bound, all for the RO3010 substrate at high aspect ratios and very small gaps.Fromentèze, Thomas · arXiv:2611.08166v1 · Fig. 5: · CC BY 4.0

[Figure 5 illustrates the comparison of the 200 eigenvalues: the top panel shows the 92 % agreement within 1 % and the 75.5 % within 0.5 %; the bottom panel highlights the minority eigenvalues that exceed the 1 % bound, all occurring for the RO3010 substrate with high aspect ratios and very small gaps, confirming the reported trend.]

Source paper

Analytical Modeling of the Admittance Tensor of Periodic Elliptical Meta-Atoms

PhysicsPhysics
View on arXiv