arXiv News

First-hand information for everyone

Site

AboutPrivacy PolicyTerms of Use

© 2026 arXiv News

Model predicts a pseudogap metal and non‑Fermi‑liquid critical point in a bilayer nickelate model | arXiv News

arXiv News

EnglishJapanese

Switch language

EnglishJapanese
Loading account…

First-hand information for everyone

Back to front page
Strongly Correlated ElectronsEnglishPublished

Model predicts a pseudogap metal and non‑Fermi‑liquid critical point in a bilayer nickelate model

March 27, 2026arXiv: 2603.25742v1

This paper studies the normal (non‑superconducting) state of a model for bilayer nickelate materials and finds a new kind of pseudogap metal and a nearby quantum critical point with non‑Fermi‑liquid behavior. The work is theoretical. The authors use a simplified microscopic model and a numerical technique to map how the electronic state changes when they vary an interlayer spin coupling and the number of charge carriers (doping). A “pseudogap” here means a depletion of low‑energy electronic states without the usual signs of symmetry breaking.

The model, called a double Kondo lattice, represents each unit cell as two layers. Each layer has an itinerant electron band coming from a dx2−y2 orbital and a localized spin‑1/2 moment from a dz2 orbital. Those two kinds of degrees of freedom are coupled on each site by a ferromagnetic Kondo‑type coupling (written JK = −2JH). The localized spins on the two layers are further coupled by an antiferromagnetic interlayer exchange J⊥. The authors solve this model with single‑site dynamical mean‑field theory (DMFT) combined with a numerical renormalization group (NRG) impurity solver. This method gives controlled access to low‑energy spectral functions while treating interactions that are local within the unit cell.

The main result is a phase diagram with two distinct metallic Fermi liquid states when interlayer tunneling t⊥ is set to zero. In the overdoped region the system is a conventional Fermi liquid with a large Fermi surface. In the underdoped region it becomes a pseudogap metal that the authors call a “second Fermi liquid” (sFL). The sFL shows small hole pockets, very heavy quasiparticles (small quasiparticle residue and large effective mass), and a clear pseudogap in the spectral function. Remarkably, the sFL violates the perturbative form of the Luttinger theorem (a constraint linking Fermi surface volume to particle density) even though the calculation does not show symmetry breaking or fractionalized excitations. The transition between the two metals is continuous at t⊥=0 and sits in the universality class related to a two‑channel, two‑spin Kondo impurity model. The authors also present an intuitive ancilla‑fermion picture in which the auxiliary fermion acts like a spin‑polaron and produces a Kondo‑like resonance seen directly in the DMFT spectral data.

Why this matters: the bilayer nickelate La3Ni2O7 has generated experimental interest because of high superconducting transition temperatures under pressure. The authors apply their framework to that material and argue that current samples (hole doping x ≈ 0.5, measured relative to a Ni d8 reference) likely sit on the overdoped, conventional Fermi liquid side. If true, moving toward electron doping might access the pseudogap sFL phase and the non‑Fermi‑liquid quantum critical regime. The paper also reports energy scales: with a finite interlayer tunneling t⊥ they still find an extended NFL window between a coherence temperature Tcoh (as small as ~10−3 t) and a higher NFL scale TNFL (around ~0.1 t). The authors suggest this NFL region could control normal‑state properties above the superconducting transition and might relate to experimentally observed “strange‑metal” behavior.

Important caveats and uncertainties: the results come from an idealized double Kondo model and from single‑site DMFT, which assumes the electronic self‑energy does not depend on momentum. The authors choose t⊥=0 to expose a sharp phase transition; in real materials finite interlayer hopping will turn that transition into a crossover and change low‑energy details. The phase boundaries and energy scales also depend on parameter choices such as the Hund’s coupling (the paper reports distinct behavior for JH ≳ 2.5 t) and the Hubbard U (they show data for U = 8 t). Finally, real materials can host other interactions and orders that are not in this minimal model. The authors present their predictions as testable: experiments that change the carrier density or layer coupling could look for the pseudogap signatures, the small pockets, and the non‑Fermi‑liquid scaling reported here.

Source paper

Pseudogap and Non-Fermi-liquid criticality in double Kondo model for bilayer nickelates

Strongly Correlated Electrons
View on arXiv