arXiv News

First-hand information for everyone

Site

AboutPrivacy PolicyTerms of Use

© 2026 arXiv News

First-principles lattice QCD study of inclusive ¯B_s → X_{¯s c} ℓ ¯ν decays with a 7% result | arXiv News

arXiv News

EnglishJapanese

Switch language

EnglishJapanese
Loading account…

First-hand information for everyone

Back to front page
High Energy Physics - LatticeEnglishPublished

First-principles lattice QCD study of inclusive ¯B_s → X_{¯s c} ℓ ¯ν decays with a 7% result

July 2, 2026arXiv: 2607.01116v1

This paper presents a practical strategy to compute the inclusive decay rate of the ¯B_s meson decaying to any charmed‑strange hadronic final state (written X_{¯s c}) plus a lepton and neutrino, using lattice QCD. “Inclusive” means the rate sums over all possible hadronic final states instead of selecting a single channel. The authors combine non‑perturbative lattice data with analytic guidance from the Operator Product Expansion (OPE), an expansion that becomes exact when the heavy quark masses are taken infinitely large. Their first physical determination of the decay rate comes with a 7% total uncertainty.

To reach this result the team performed numerical lattice QCD simulations on a subset of gauge ensembles produced by the Extended Twisted Mass Collaboration (ETMC) with n_f = 2+1+1 dynamical quarks (two light, one strange, one charm). They did not simulate directly at the physical bottom quark mass because of well known numerical issues on currently available lattices. Instead they computed correlators at lighter-than‑physical heavy quark masses (their heaviest simulated ¯B_s mass is M¯_Bs^max = 4.3 GeV) while keeping the ratio M_{D_s}/M_{¯B_s} fixed to its physical value. They then interpolated these lattice results to the physical point using OPE predictions to guide the heavy‑mass dependence.

A technical advance in the paper is a new method for computing the required four‑point lattice correlators. These four‑point objects are needed to access inclusive decay information but suffer a rapidly worsening signal‑to‑noise ratio as the heavy quark mass grows. The authors changed their numerical strategy for these correlators so that the signal‑to‑noise problem is overcome, at the cost of greater computational expense. For the spectral reconstruction step (extracting the smeared decay rate from the correlators) they use the Hansen–Lupo–Tantalo (HLT) algorithm, a method they and others have applied in earlier inclusive decay studies.

Why this matters: a precise, first‑principles determination of this inclusive decay rate helps pin down the CKM matrix element |V_cb|, a fundamental parameter of the Standard Model that controls many weak decays. Inclusive and exclusive determinations of |V_cb| have shown a long‑standing tension, and improved theory input for inclusive decays can help clarify that issue. Producing independent lattice results with different discretizations and analysis methods, as pursued here and by other groups using alternative heavy‑quark techniques, strengthens confidence in the theory input.

Important caveats remain. The present number is not yet final: the result does not include a dedicated estimate of finite‑volume systematic effects and is based on only three lattice spacings and a limited set of gauge configurations. The quoted 7% uncertainty is dominated by those limited configuration ensembles, and the authors state they expect to reduce it in the near future. Their approach also relies on interpolating from lighter heavy quarks up to the physical bottom mass using OPE guidance; this step is sound when the heavy masses are large, but it introduces an extrapolation uncertainty that the paper discusses and estimates. Overall the work demonstrates a feasible path to precise, first‑principles inclusive B_s decay rates while identifying the remaining sources of uncertainty to be addressed.

Source paper

Inclusive $\bar B_s\mapsto X_{\bar sc} \ell \bar ν$ decays from lattice QCD: computational strategy and a first physical result

High Energy Physics - LatticeHigh Energy Physics - Phenomenology
View on arXiv