arXiv News

First-hand information for everyone

Site

AboutPrivacy PolicyTerms of Use

© 2026 arXiv News

AI‑driven handover policy boosts LEO satellite service continuity | arXiv News

arXiv News

EnglishJapanese

Switch language

EnglishJapanese
Loading account…

First-hand information for everyone

Back to front page
cs.NIEnglishPublished

AI‑driven handover policy boosts LEO satellite service continuity

November 14, 2026arXiv: 2611.16878v1

Low‑Earth‑orbit satellites move quickly, forcing frequent handovers of user connections. Traditional handover settings—fixed thresholds for signal strength and timing—cannot keep up with changing signals and satellite paths. A new framework uses reinforcement learning on the policy of a satellite network to choose the right moment and target for each handover. The policy (PPO‑SHD) takes into account the signal power received, which satellites are connected to ground stations, how long each satellite stays above a minimum elevation angle, and the geometry of the links.

In simulations, the PPO‑SHD policy keeps the network available 99.32 % of the time when the minimum elevation angle is set to 40°. That is 1.67 percentage points higher than the best tuned fixed‑threshold method (O‑HT) and 1.41 p.p. higher than a method that simply picks the satellite with the shortest delay (LD). In the same trials, the policy cuts the cumulative radio‑link‑failure time by 85.7 % compared with O‑HT and by 85.0 % compared with LD.

Figure showing PPO‑SHD achieving 99.32% service availability, 1.67 percentage points above O‑HT and 1.41 above LD, while reducing RLF duration by 85.7% relative to O‑HT and 85.0% relative to LD.
Comparison of PPO‑SHD against O‑HT and LD: availability (red bars) and cumulative RLF duration (RLF bars).
Fig. 3.
Han, Jui-Che, Khan, Nasir, Seeram, Siva Satya Sri Ganesh, Cavdar, Cicek · arXiv:2611.16878v1 · Fig. 3: · CC BY 4.0

The handover delay imposed by the PPO policy is very close to that of the LD method—only 0.17 s more—and is 27 % lower than O‑HT. Thus, the policy strikes a balance between avoiding needless handovers and not letting the link fail.

Figure depicting PPO‑SHD cumulative handover delay of 5.21 s, 0.17 s higher than LD’s 5.04 s and 27 % lower than O‑HT’s 7.14 s.
Fig. 4. Cumulative handover delay for PPO‑SHD, O‑HT, and LD schemata.Han, Jui-Che, Khan, Nasir, Seeram, Siva Satya Sri Ganesh, Cavdar, Cicek · arXiv:2611.16878v1 · Fig. 4: · CC BY 4.0

These results show that adding topology information to the learning process can give LEO networks both higher uptime and lower handover burden, although the policy still needs to cope with occasional link failures when signal fading is severe or the satellite coverage becomes sparse at very high elevation thresholds.

Source paper

Topology-Aware Handover Management for Service Continuity in LEO Satellite Networks

cs.NI
View on arXiv