arXiv News

First-hand information for everyone

Site

AboutPrivacy PolicyTerms of Use

© 2026 arXiv News

A lower bound on how long a black hole must take to return information | arXiv News

arXiv News

EnglishJapanese

Switch language

EnglishJapanese
Loading account…

First-hand information for everyone

Back to front page
General Relativity and Quantum CosmologyEnglishPublished

A lower bound on how long a black hole must take to return information

May 7, 2026arXiv: 2605.03922

This paper derives a lower bound on how long an evaporating black hole must live if it eventually returns the information that fell into it. Working only with quantities measured far from the hole, the authors combine energy conservation with a requirement that the final quantum state be pure (that is, information is recovered) to show that the final purification stage cannot be arbitrarily fast. For an initial black hole mass M0 they find a minimum purification time that grows like M0^4 divided by ħ^{3/2}. With one extra assumption — that a Planck-mass black hole is metastable — the required time can become astronomically large, growing exponentially with the square of the initial mass (equivalently with its initial area).

The argument works in an ‘‘asymptotically semiclassical’’ framework. This means the authors assume quantum-gravity effects stay confined to the region near the hole and that observers far away can be treated with ordinary quantum field theory on a background spacetime. They use a recent expression for the radiative energy flux seen at future null infinity (the place where outgoing radiation is collected). In their spherically symmetric model the flux is ⟨F_rad⟩(u)=α ħ k(u)^2, where k(u) is a function called the redshift exponent that encodes the correlations of the outgoing field, and α is a constant set by the field content (for N massless scalar fields α = N/(48π)). The paper also uses a recent formula for the renormalized entanglement entropy of the radiation at null infinity: S_rad(u)=4πα ∫_{-∞}^u k(u') du'. These two relations tie the energy carried away and the quantum entropy of the radiation to the same function k(u), allowing the authors to place constraints without having to solve the unknown quantum-gravity dynamics in the interior.

Using these tools the authors split the evaporation into three phases. Phase A is the familiar semiclassical Hawking evaporation, during which the black hole loses mass and emits nearly thermal radiation; its duration scales roughly like M0^3/ħ (they quote an estimate τ_A ≈ 163 α M0^3/ħ). Phase B is a possible short quiescent period when the hole reaches Planckian mass and the radiative flux could vanish. Phase C is the purification phase, when the radiation must become correlated in such a way that the combined state at infinity becomes pure. By asking how much energy is available at infinity to create the correlations needed for purification, and using the flux and entropy relations above, they prove a lower bound on the duration of this purification phase that scales as M0^4/ħ^{3/2}.

If one further assumes that a Planck-mass remnant is metastable — a physically motivated but extra hypothesis about quantum gravity — the authors find the purification time can be extended to scale exponentially with M0^2/ħ (that is, exponential in the initial black hole area). In that case the redshift exponent during the slow-release phase is negative, which the authors interpret as signaling a white-hole–like remnant that leaks information very slowly.

Important caveats apply. The results rest on two physical assumptions: that asymptotic observables are well described semiclassically (so the analysis can be done entirely at future null infinity) and that information is ultimately recovered in the sense used by Page. The stronger exponential bound additionally requires assuming a metastable Planck-mass remnant. The paper does not attempt to derive the interior quantum-gravity evolution; it gives lower bounds based on asymptotic energy and entropy relations and on the chosen assumptions. Numerical prefactors and the constant α depend on the field content, and the bounds are minimal times rather than precise lifetimes.

Taken together, these bounds show that purification of an evaporating black hole is not free: returning information requires time and energy, and under reasonable assumptions that time can be extremely long. The results affect how theorists think about possible long-lived remnants and have potential implications for scenarios that involve primordial black holes, where lifetime estimates matter for observational consequences.

Source paper

Minimum lifetime of a black hole

General Relativity and Quantum CosmologyCosmology and Nongalactic AstrophysicsHigh Energy Physics - Theory
View on arXiv